Plans approved for new building at 67 Vestry, but Tribeca artists still hope to keep their homes

Downtown Express photo by Zach Williams Residents including many artists at 67 Vestry St. are hoping to keep their homes although the city recently approved plans for a new building at the site.
Downtown Express photo by Zach Williams
Residents including many artists at 67 Vestry St. are hoping to keep their homes although the city recently approved plans for a new building at the site.

BY ZACH WILLIAMS     |  Residents of 67 Vestry St.  have not given up on efforts to preserve their homes in an 117-year-old former warehouse in Tribeca.

Although efforts to landmark the building fell short in the spring, a handful of options remain for the tenants, including challenging the permit process and working through local elected representatives.

Owner Aby Rosen received approval from the city Dept. of Buildings on July 22 for an 11-story building, which would replace the current structure, should demolition permits eventually be acquired. However, no such application has been received by D.O.B., according to department records.

In the meantime, residents are examining their legal options, including possible grounds for appealing the approved building design with the help of Borough President Gale Brewer. There is also talk about expanding the Tribeca North Historic District to accommodate 67 Vestry St. — which lies just outside the current district boundaries — with the incoming Landmarks Preservation Commission chairperson Meenakshi Srinivan, according to Jacqueline Miro, a 16-year resident of the building. She added that a date for such a meeting has yet to be set due to scheduling conflicts.

“It’s not an easy building to pull down,” she said on Aug. 10. “It’s got history. It’s got force and it’s got unmovable tenants.”

A previous effort to have the city Landmarks Commission re-examine its prior decision was not successful. Robert Tierney, outgoing chairperson of the commission, reiterated the reasoning behind the board’s prior decision not to landmark the building, in a June 1 letter to Community Board 1.

“Though the property’s history as the first large, purpose-built warehouse of the A&P Company and as an example of the work of architect Frank Dinkelberg does not altogether lack merit, there are numerous more intact buildings within the Tribeca historic district that encapsulate this area’s warehouse history,” Tierney wrote.

Alterations made in 1910 added two floors, diluting the historical value of the building, Tierney added.

The nine-story building, though, is one of the few remaining warehouses along West St., said Miro, an architect. Its role in the advent of reinforced concrete within the American architectural canon further distinguishes it from other former warehouses which utilized more primitive materials, according to Miro.

More recently, the building housed some of the artists, including Andy Warhol, who would transform Tribeca during the ‘70s and ‘80s from a grimy industrial area into a ritzy residential neighborhood. Now the neighborhood ranks among the most affluent in New York City — making it prime territory for the expansion of real estate portfolios in the booming local market.

According to the plans approved by D.O.B., the new building would be 134 feet high and have 42 residential units.

“I love Old Tribeca, There’s not much left,” said Orshi Drozdik, an artist and longtime resident of the building.

Fifteen out of 23 units within the building remain occupied, according to Miro. However, the remaining residents fall into two categories, she acknowledged: longtime residents inclined to fight displacement, and a “less enamored” group of residents who are more open to negotiation, or who are just sick of fighting a well-connected landlord and “endless construction” work.

Among them was one resident who said he received a buy-out offer from the landlord, though it was “not in writing.” The 15-year resident added that he expects Rosen to eventually prevail in acquiring all the necessary permits to construct the building. A “reasonable” offer would convince him to leave, said the resident, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he said it could affect negotiations.

Other residents said they were not sure what to do. While they would prefer to stay, the nature of rental properties means that their homes were always owned by someone else, such as now with Rosen. Only the one resident said he has received an offer from the landlord, among five residents interviewed for this article.

Rosen representatives did not respond to several phone messages requesting comment.

Now is the critical juncture as residents search for final options, as Rosen prepares for the next step in the construction process. What will happen next, no one knows, said Miro.

“What will come first — the egg or the hen? We do not know,” she said.

For now, Drozdik said she will enjoy the building with a wide roof ripe for wine sipping, as much as possible.

Miro said the “gregarious” community within the building has been a place where people can remain the same even as their once gritty loft apartments became another target of local development.

“I have no idea,” said Drozdik when asked where she would go if she lost her apartment. “So I just want to enjoy it as long as I can live here and hope that [Rosen] cannot demolish it.”

More from around NYC